3 ms·
I read it, though. so you're wrong on both of your assumptions.
by naikrovek 5y ago
I read it, though. so you're wrong on both of your assumptions.
- refurb 5y agoThere is nothing in the article to suggest Amazon broke the law or interfered with the union vote other than someone who saw security open the package locker. Nobody saw the ballots being handled or moved. Nobody saw fake ballots being added. And based on the final vote, it would have had to been a massive fraud for the final vote to be 70%+ "no".