5 ms·
Its not "truthful but misleading". Its either true or not true since they are making a single claim against a specific fact. Either Amazon had keys to the mailb
by balozi 5y ago
Its not "truthful but misleading". Its either true or not true since they are making a single claim against a specific fact. Either Amazon had keys to the mailbox used to mail ballots or they did not.
- tomnipotent 5y ago> Its not "truthful but misleading" Absolutely it is, if the keys do not give access to outbound mail. It gives the impression that Amazon may have tampered with votes, which would be impossible if the keys only give access to inbound parcels.
- georgeplusplus 5y agoWhat difference does having access to the inbound parcels make when this clustered mailbox was only installed for the union votes? Amazon should not be using it period.
- newacct583 5y ago> Its either true or not true since they are making a single claim against a specific fact. The clear implication of the headline is that Amazon had the ability to tamper with the union election. That is, by definition, not "a single claim". In fact it seems to be false.
- NeutronStar 5y agoDid they have the ability or did they not? That's all that truly matters. Yes or no?