4 ms·
They do, if you don’t have 100% code coverage then you get what you get
by o-__-o 5y ago
They do, if you don’t have 100% code coverage then you get what you get
- NateEag 5y ago100% code coverage isn't even close to a guarantee of correctness.
- o-__-o 5y agoBut is the easiest metric to guage test quality. What I’m saying is this code is probably not well tested
- dr_zoidberg 5y agoThis code isn't tested at all. They messed up copying code from a previous implementation, that's how bad this is. If they had had a few basic tests in place they would've spotted this before it even had a chance to be a problem.
- o-__-o 5y agoThen the problem has zero to do with the type of testing, now does it :)