4 ms·
IT's not my area of expertise, but the eudev page does speak of restoring some functionality that it lacks without systemd running alongside it, as well as remo
by Blikkentrekker 5y ago
IT's not my area of expertise, but the eudev page does speak of restoring some functionality that it lacks without systemd running alongside it, as well as removing glibc and GCC specific dependencies.
There is probably a reason why even many binary systems adopted eudev instead. — the maintainers often justify this with “problems” with udev but never go into much detail about what that is but the language does keep suggesting that it restored some functionality that is missing if it run sans systemd.
- bkor 5y ago> but the language does keep suggesting that it restored some functionality that is missing if it run sans systemd. People often misunderstand what libsystemd does. See the many reactions here, but also e.g. the response by Devuan around libsystemd. Too often people assume things around systemd, or too heavily rely on incorrect information found via Google. That things are being done this way by a few projects to me isn't enough. Nowadays people did not thoroughly investigate things before they take a decision. See e.g. the various responses in this thread.