3 ms·

It literally codefies "the rich gets richer" deep into the protocol. While I'm pro-eth, this makes it a lot less "fair" in my opinion. With PoW, miners can't r

It literally codefies "the rich gets richer" deep into the protocol. While I'm pro-eth, this makes it a lot less "fair" in my opinion. With PoW, miners can't really hold on to the coins for very long, so they have to dump it to cover electricity and hardware costs which always creates supply whereas with PoS, a staker can just hold on to the coins they get forever at no cost and their share of the pie keeps getting larger and larger forever. To be clear, I'm not complaining, if eth decides to pay me 5-10% per year based on my holdings for a simple cryptographic signature, I'm not gonna say no, but it definitely creates a weird dynamic where new entrants will have to buy at the price the stakers decide to sell, which could be sky high since we have no pressure to sell.

Sargos 5y ago
The difference is that anyone can stake. It's going to be the default way to store ETH akin to a savings account for most people so pretty much everyone is going to share in that PoS issuance. This also doesn't affect new buyers as they are buying ETH to use it most likely so it's not being held long term. If they decide to buy long term then they also get the PoS issuance so everyone wins.
- useryman 5y ago
  > The difference is that anyone can stake. Unless you're entering a pool, you need 32 ETH to stake. I remember when that wasn't a lot.
  - Sargos 5y ago
    The base protocol uses 32 ETH for technical reasons but yes, as you said, pools like RocketPool, Lido, etc along with exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, and even everyday banks also allow staking any amount of ETH by anyone to take advantage of the stable staking returns. In a practical sense there's no barrier to staking ETH and it'll likely be the default way to hold ETH long term as a low risk savings vehicle.
intotheabyss 5y ago
It wont be 5-10% for long. At steady state, it'll be a tug of war between staking Ether in the beaconchain, or depositing Ether into defi protocols. While it might seem like your ETH are just passively earning, actually staking 32 ETH today can be quite involved, so it's not exactly passive at the protocol layer.

Sargos 5y ago

The difference is that anyone can stake. It's going to be the default way to store ETH akin to a savings account for most people so pretty much everyone is going to share in that PoS issuance. This also doesn't affect new buyers as they are buying ETH to use it most likely so it's not being held long term. If they decide to buy long term then they also get the PoS issuance so everyone wins.

useryman 5y ago
> The difference is that anyone can stake. Unless you're entering a pool, you need 32 ETH to stake. I remember when that wasn't a lot.
- Sargos 5y ago
  The base protocol uses 32 ETH for technical reasons but yes, as you said, pools like RocketPool, Lido, etc along with exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, and even everyday banks also allow staking any amount of ETH by anyone to take advantage of the stable staking returns. In a practical sense there's no barrier to staking ETH and it'll likely be the default way to hold ETH long term as a low risk savings vehicle.

intotheabyss 5y ago

It wont be 5-10% for long. At steady state, it'll be a tug of war between staking Ether in the beaconchain, or depositing Ether into defi protocols. While it might seem like your ETH are just passively earning, actually staking 32 ETH today can be quite involved, so it's not exactly passive at the protocol layer.