Though the article (lightly) suggests the articles were taken down due to corporate influence, with a "hiding the truth" style bent. The comments at this stage

Though the article (lightly) suggests the articles were taken down due to corporate influence, with a "hiding the truth" style bent. The comments at this stage also suggest that this is a free-speech issue, or an issue of raising money for humanitarian issues. I think the simplest explanation may be that game sites don't feel the need to get involved in political issues. Just like HN also doesn't get involved. There are many other and better sources to be informed of the issues, and places where you can be directed to charities. Why should every site on the internet become a focal point for the Israeli/Palestinian conflict? What about the Uighurs? Where is their coverage? Or the Rohingya? The list goes on and on. I expect to get downvoted for this comment, but keen to hear what the actual opposing view is. Please comment if you feel I'm wrong.