3 ms·
It definitely depends on what you're doing with it. In the article the author is using it to parse only nginx logs to report page hits counts - I probably would
by fabbari 5y ago
It definitely depends on what you're doing with it. In the article the author is using it to parse only nginx logs to report page hits counts - I probably would have not gone with Elasticsearch to begin with. I find it strange that the issue with InfluxDB was the lack of 'Group by'; you can use 'Distinct' with other aggregation functions with the same result - and without having to write and maintain your own stack.
I appreciate - and often indulge - in writing stacks of software that are better implemented other open source, but I wouldn't say that the article describes a solution that is viable as a replacement for Elasticsearch.
- nethunters 5y agoI think it's best put as a replacement for ElasticSearch for those who don't really need ElasticSearch. Edit - i.e. where ES is overkill for the use case, however for an appropriate use case ElasticSearch is amazing
- xbar 5y agoI didn't read the article, but I think this is a sizable audience.