3 ms·
I feel the same about static site generators, which is why I'm working on Lancer[0]. It's designed to be as close to plain HTML as possible, with just enough fe
by simplify 5y ago
I feel the same about static site generators, which is why I'm working on Lancer[0]. It's designed to be as close to plain HTML as possible, with just enough features to support generating static sites, and even SSR and server endpoints.
For example, Lancer doesn't have built-in support for markdown. However, it supports arbitrarily transforming your <template> tags so you can add markdown support to your website with effectively a one-liner[1]. It's this type of approach that I hope to build a framework that requires as little framework knowledge as possible, while being flexible enough for all content-based websites.
[0] https://lancer.studio/blog/the-fight-against-complexity https://lancer.studio/blog/the-fight-against-complexity
[1] https://lancer.studio/docs/guides/markdown-support https://lancer.studio/docs/guides/markdown-support