>> but not necessarily because they were an extrovert. I had to think about it, but I think I agree. Him being an extrovert had little to do with this particul

>> but not necessarily because they were an extrovert. I had to think about it, but I think I agree. Him being an extrovert had little to do with this particular approach. I just associated it with him, because, well, he was hard to miss. Thank you. That was an interesting conversation:>