> I'm always impressed by how effortlessly this claim of the extraordinary readability of Go code is thrown around by the language's apostles, given how substan

> I'm always impressed by how effortlessly this claim of the extraordinary readability of Go code is thrown around by the language's apostles, given how substantial that claim is, and that it's only backed up by anecdotal arguments with no context about things like the problem solved or the size of the code base involved. > I think this belief in the readability of Go code ... I guess you'd be the one to know since you're the one who originally made the claim. To be fair, Some of the items in your bulleted list are downsides to the language. It can't be all things to all people.