4 ms·
Probably because his approach has nothing to do with introvert vs. extrovert, and is just normal baseline professionalism.
by void_mint 5y ago
Probably because his approach has nothing to do with introvert vs. extrovert, and is just normal baseline professionalism.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoI very much disagree. I am not sure if it is a question of culture, nurture or what, but when I do mess up, I acknowledge the mess up, ask for forgiveness and move on. Up until that point, it certainly would not occur to me to either ignore it or just keep pressing in the wrong direction despite being objectively wrong. I would not call it professionalism at all.
- void_mint 5y agoUnless you did not correctly quote the advice, nothing that you said in this post invalidates the previous advice. Being wrong _is okay_, but if you're suggesting something, you should remain calm and be confident your suggestion is in line with your current understanding of a problem space. If wrong, continue to remain calm, acknowledge, apologize and move on. Being wrong shouldn't shake your confidence (again, even if you're an introvert).
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoI think I am willing to agree with your interpretation of the quote. It may have not been a good example since I can't really go into more details here. I do have a philosophical objection though. Unlike Dr. House, I do not possess merely theoretical capacity for being wrong. I recognize I can be wrong and I recognize that me being wrong has real world consequences that I need to consider. It is not about shaking my confidence. It is about whether it is possible I am wrong in this particular case. Confidence is pointless here since the consequences involved will not be BSed away.
- void_mint 5y ago> I think I am willing to agree with your interpretation of the quote. It may have not been a good example since I can't really go into more details here. All good. I totally accept that that individual quote did not do justice to the situation you were trying to convey. I am not trying to be aggressive. > I do have a philosophical objection though. Unlike Dr. House, I do not possess merely theoretical capacity for being wrong. I recognize I can be wrong and I recognize that me being wrong has real world consequences that I need to consider. I am an overwhelming extrovert. I believe that your gripe is less about inro vs. extro, and much much more about culture. I have worked in environments where being wrong but trying hard is applauded, and I have worked in environments where being wrong (regardless of how or why) is shamed. The latter feels bad to me, as it sounds like it would you. > It is not about shaking my confidence. It is about whether it is possible I am wrong in this particular case. Confidence is pointless here since the consequences involved will not be BSed away. I totally agree with you. If getting something wrong will cause any kind of problem (beyond just, "lets fix it and keep going"), it's a culture problem and rightly will impact your confidence. I would say, your boss was probably a moron, but not necessarily because they were an extrovert.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y ago>> but not necessarily because they were an extrovert. I had to think about it, but I think I agree. Him being an extrovert had little to do with this particular approach. I just associated it with him, because, well, he was hard to miss. Thank you. That was an interesting conversation:>