3 ms·
It’s not “guilty until proven innocent” to keep evidence if the defense can’t show it’s been compromised. As a logical extreme example, you are suggesting that
by jakelazaroff 5y ago
It’s not “guilty until proven innocent” to keep evidence if the defense can’t show it’s been compromised.
As a logical extreme example, you are suggesting that courts forbid eyewitness testimony, since it’s always possible that they are mistaken or lying.
- Tostino 5y agoNot GP, but I would highly prefer they give eye witness testimony much less weight than they do today.