4 ms·
I understand. It sounds awful. The use-case here being the built-in browser requires host permissions to all url's for navigation purposes. Removing it causing
by vigneshanand 5y ago
I understand. It sounds awful. The use-case here being the built-in browser requires host permissions to all url's for navigation purposes. Removing it causing access issues when navigating to a another page through a link within the webpage.
- pvg 5y agoWouldn't it be easier (if a little less slick-looking) to hang the date selection UI off an extension bar button rather than putting it into the actual web page? Then that permission could potentially be dropped.
- vigneshanand 5y agoThat would indeed work. But the utility of Vandal is to not just support navigation but also to present an alterative vision for time-travel :D.
- anotheryou 5y agocould it be a website instead?
- mrkramer 5y agoThen it would lose browser extension utility or in another words you wouldn't have it under you fingertips ready to use easily at any moment.
- anotheryou 5y agoWell you could support both or make a browser extension that simply redirects there on click. Not sure what permissions are needed to get the current url from the plugin though. But if it's really more about a good way to browse the way back machine I think a web-service/site would make more sense. Installing a browser extension is quite a hurdle for something you don't need that often. Too bad bookmarklets are not really a thing anymore, that would work well.