6 ms·
We’re running everything on self-hosted runners and it works like a charm. They are also way, way faster than what GitHub can provide. We get the advantages of
by pilif 5y ago
We’re running everything on self-hosted runners and it works like a charm. They are also way, way faster than what GitHub can provide.
We get the advantages of the huge GitHub Actions ecosystem while having impressive (and fully controllable) performance and very easy access to out infrastructure for deployments.
- giorgioz 5y agoWhat do you use to run the self-hosted runners?
- iBotPeaches 5y agoIn our case, we use a mac mini solely for building mobile applications via fastlane with a self-runner. Doing that with the GitHub runner on Mac would be mega expensive. The rest of the CI/test process runs on GitHub runners.
- easton 5y agoDoes that work with M1/Apple Silicon Macs or Intel-only?
- pilif 5y agoGitHub right now only has their self-hosted Mac runner released as an Intel Build, but it works fine through Rosetta, though running Apple Silicon Xcode might require some additional wrapping of commands with `arch` which might or might not be built into the pre-built action you're using. We're currently using an Intel Mac we've used from before we migrated from Jenkins to GitHub actions, so your mileage may vary.