Most of this was better left unsaid. So many words to state the obvious that like, for example, this would be illegal? Did the coy language not tip you off to

Most of this was better left unsaid. So many words to state the obvious that like, for example, this would be illegal? Did the coy language not tip you off to the fact they realize that? Then suddenly trying to champion Cellbrite as the reason we something as anti-privacy as backdoor mandates and encryption bans while at the same we're already seeing countries inch towards that? And then seriously, acting like because Cellbrite is being used against rioters somehow this was a bad time for Signal to point out the fact that Cellbrite is an insecure pos on top of it's dubious intended purpose?? Didn't I just go through 1000 words explaining why what Signal did won't matter anyways? - This whole thing just reads like someone who needed to go "well actually", it's not really saying anything novel or interesting, and in the pursuit of defending Cellebrite of all things, it makes some pretty dubious connections.