2 ms·
I'm not talking about the "full self driving" optional feature. Personally I agree with criticism of the FSD product name and I think it's an inappropriate and
by simondotau 5y ago
I'm not talking about the "full self driving" optional feature. Personally I agree with criticism of the FSD product name and I think it's an inappropriate and misleading name. But that's not relevant here, because the car did not have the "full self driving" feature.
This is actually very important, because it means the customer explicitly declined Tesla's repeated prompts to option "full self driving" features into their vehicle. Therefore this customer will have been acutely aware that "full self driving" is a feature their car did not have and thus the car could not be capable of any such "full self-driving".
- clouddrover 5y agoIt had "full self driving". He said so himself: https://insideevs.com/news/507038/nhtsa-investigate-tesla-crash-california/ https://insideevs.com/news/507038/nhtsa-investigate-tesla-cr...
- carlivar 5y agoIt is amusing that this comment thread came to an abrupt end once you were contradicted about what is "actually very important".