4 ms·
I'd be much more likely to read it if it said "Afghanistan’s President Doesn't Help His Brother Secure Lucrative Mining Deals with a U.S. Contractor".
by kingsuper20 5y ago
I'd be much more likely to read it if it said "Afghanistan’s President Doesn't Help His Brother Secure Lucrative Mining Deals with a U.S. Contractor".
- ChuckNorris89 5y agoIKR? Don't get why people are surprised about this when even in Germany/Europe it's that common for government contracts going to friends and family members of the ruling class (through some very complex schemes to hide the blatant corruption of course).
- vlovich123 5y agoTo me the article is more interesting as it details a shadow military-industrial effort (the article talks about links to Patreus) that’s been pushing an agenda to mine minerals perhaps valuable to the military but even more valuable to them personally. And of course the entire mining operation was abandoned under Obama because it financed militants, used children for the mining operation, and was extremely hazardous to the environment. Of course the Trump administration greenlit this scheme and the Afghan President’s family, which personally benefited from this arrangement (despite being banned by law) supported this arrangement (because hey, it’s not the American government, just well-connected private businesses). The scale of corruption and self-dealing here enabled under the Trump administration is actually quite fascinating. No wonder he enjoys support from his constituents when he’s enriching them in this way. It’s how a lot of people choose to wield power unfortunately.