3 ms·
I'm pretty much aligned with the Israeli side on almost everything, and I 100% agree with Israel's right to defend itself. But this argument of "we announced t
by enriquto 5y ago
I'm pretty much aligned with the Israeli side on almost everything, and I 100% agree with Israel's right to defend itself. But this argument of "we announced the bombing of that building in advance" is utter bullshit. By the same logic, Hamas also warned before launching the rockets, does that make it any less wrong?
- tguvot 5y agoThere is some difference between precision bombing of a single building after advance warning was given to those who reside inside and indiscriminate shooting of MLRS like systems into civilian area after saying "we will shoot rockets into Tel Aviv"
- postalrat 5y agoSo give them more precise weapons and everything will be good.
- tguvot 5y agoLast time around (few years ago) there were unironic demands from HRW or somebody alike to share Iron Dome tech with hamas
- totalZero 5y agoIf the tech is purely defensive then I don't see exactly what the irony would be. You could even set up a third party to administer two-way defense systems in order to prevent anyone from reverse engineering the technology.
- tguvot 5y agoIt's less defensive when you will use Iron Dome to protect rocket launchers. I don't remember anybody, for example, asking USA to provide taliban with stingers or c-ram for protection, "to even out playing field"