4 ms·
That doesn't mean that no chiropractors use it. And even the quackiest quack's “I've seen this problem before, this fixed it” is better than the best doctor's
by wizzwizz4 6y ago
That doesn't mean that no chiropractors use it.
And even the quackiest quack's “I've seen this problem before, this fixed it” is better than the best doctor's “I've never seen this before, but I can guess what might help”. You can have empiricism without science.
- CarelessExpert 6y agoUhuh. So the associations who ostensibly regulate this "profession" allow chiropractic practicioners to make absurd claims about curing asthma or hearing loss. But there's good chiros out there so that makes it all fine! Got it. Should we just jump to the No True Scotsman thing, now, or should we go back and forth a bit first?
- wizzwizz4 6y agoMy attempt at nuance wasn't intended as a rebuttal. I'd pick a random doctor over a random chiro any day.