4 ms·
I agree the current one is a major change but it's not mature yet. It hasn't stood the test of time. Twitter was built on RoR when that was the coolest new thin
by intev 5y ago
I agree the current one is a major change but it's not mature yet. It hasn't stood the test of time. Twitter was built on RoR when that was the coolest new thing to build things on and Uber's booking engine was on Node.js when everything was being run on Node. I'm sure there's more I'm missing. .
- EvilEy3 5y agoYou seem to be missing my point. Compose and SwiftUI are React of mobile world. React certainly stood the test of time.
- intev 5y agoThat's to be seen. I very clearly remember when Angular first came out, that was clearly the way to move forward. People switched in droves. Then React came along and changed everything. React has also remained more popular than Angular has, but we didn't know that till years later. Some chose to remain in Angular (my old company) thinking it will blow over and we can swap to the next paradigm instead. Turned out React was flexible enough to last a while. Somehow you can perfectly see this is the React of mobile and not Angular?
- pixel_tracing 5y agoUnclear on what you mean here React will always be inferior to SwiftUI and Compose. All Apple has to do is release a new port of Javascript<Whatever> version 2 with limitations and boom goodbye React
- EvilEy3 5y agoCompose is literally React. It has different execution model, but the same programming model. Maybe you should first read about subject before arguing for the sake of arguing? https://speakerdeck.com/lelandrichardson/react-meet-compose?slide=2 https://speakerdeck.com/lelandrichardson/react-meet-compose?...
- intev 5y agoI don't care that it's literally React. The react model doesn't work for every platform. I do know the subject. I'm no expert but I've lived long enough to know that one paradigm on one platform is not the solution for all platforms. Stop making assumptions.
- EvilEy3 5y agoName one where it doesn't work.