3 ms·
I confess I didn't read it all, because there was too much of the adversarial stuff I'm not interested in. His point that it's a agreement to exchange labor fo
by jeffrallen 5y ago
I confess I didn't read it all, because there was too much of the adversarial stuff I'm not interested in.
His point that it's a agreement to exchange labor for something else is spot on. My last two jobs had, statutorily and morally ZERO financial negotiating margin. One was an NGO, where I believed in the goals and strategy of the organization and so I enthusiastically accepted the salary level in exchange for what the job gave me. Next, I moved to academia, where the opportunity to have contact with young people and world class researchers also balanced out for me the constraints of the civil service salary grid (thus, statutorily impossible to negotiate $). Both jobs also respected my family life, which is precious, way beyond $$$.
Negotiate how you spend your life, yes! But with all the variables on the table, not only $$$.
- whall6 5y agoAt the NGO, any foregone salary can be used to further the interests of the organization. This likely brought you as much utility as additional salary itself.
- daniellarusso 5y agoThe article does mention this, to evaluate the offer beyond the money aspect, work-life balance, enrichment, culture, etc.