3 ms·
What? What about it is "logically impossible"? I really doubt you have a proof that it is impossible, so why the appeal to "logic"?
by tree_of_item 15y ago
What? What about it is "logically impossible"? I really doubt you have a proof that it is impossible, so why the appeal to "logic"?
- yters 15y agoIf we are intelligent agents per Dembski's description of intelligence, then there is a logical proof that we cannot be artificial intelligences.
- tree_of_item 15y agoI don't think that's a sensible claim at all. "Proof that humans are not artificial intelligences" doesn't even seem to be a coherent idea. I'm going to go ahead and assume you've misunderstood what this person was talking about, as the alternative is to say that you're sitting on proof of the impossibility of a very quickly moving field with extremely deep implications for the future of humanity, and I've never once heard of it. Unless you'd like to explain it :)