4 ms·
Oh, sorry, I misunderstood your meaning when you wrote "That pretty much works now?" — I thought it was a question as to whether a more traditional Prom archite
by sagichmal 5y ago
Oh, sorry, I misunderstood your meaning when you wrote "That pretty much works now?" — I thought it was a question as to whether a more traditional Prom architecture could do it, but I see now you're just saying you already have this set up.
- tptacek 5y agoRight. But also: I'm not trying to be dismissive. We both know that we're looking at this through different lenses. I'm genuinely curious how your lens could inform mine; like, is there something I'm missing? Where, by deploying a much more conventional Prometheus architecture, I could somehow make our users happier? I don't see it, but I'm a dummy; if there's something for me to learn, I'm happy to learn it.
- sagichmal 5y agoI'm pretty confident that the end result would be simpler in an architectural sense (i.e. fewer components), it would be easier to understand and maintain, and it would behave both more predictably and more reliably. But these are subjective claims! Not everyone thinks the same way!