4 ms·
In my experience, with the exception of the keyboard, MacBooks have always had pretty good build quality. I know every single person reading this is screaming T
by chipotle_coyote 5y ago
In my experience, with the exception of the keyboard, MacBooks have always had pretty good build quality. I know every single person reading this is screaming THAT'S A PRETTY BIG HONKING EXCEPTION and, yes, absolutely, but the "new" keyboard that replaced the butterfly style one -- which is really not a new keyboard at all, but essentially the external keyboard they've been using for years at this point -- is solid.
As for "More [actually good] software supports macOS," I agree that's the definition of an opinion, but it's one that I tend to share, I admit. I think it depends on what you want to do with your computer, though. I'm frequently using BBEdit (it's what I spend all my time in at my technical writing job, in fact), Acorn, Retrobatch, and Ulysses (what I spend all my time in doing fiction writing these days), and none of those have Linux equivalents that I really consider equivalent. YMMV, obviously, but I've tried many of the semi-equivalents that would be available to me if I went back to Linux, and...I could make them work, but either not as well or with way, way more effort.
And, as for customization, this is a weird one -- I think different people look at "customization" differently. For me, I don't much care about widget and aesthetic customization, but I love love love things like macOS's Services menu, particularly in combination with Automator, and third-party automation apps like Keyboard Maestro, Hazel, and Alfred -- none of which I've found real Linux equivalents to yet. (They may be out there, but if so, they're not making themselves obvious.) I think Apple actually gives you way more knobs to turn than they're usually given credit for, but against stereotype, they're knobs deep under the hood.
Having said that, if I did end up spending a lot of time in Linux again, I'm almost positive I'd go with Xfce once more. I loved it nearly 20 years ago and the times I've checked in since then have just been more positive. :)
- KptMarchewa 5y agoi9 macbooks had so poor thermal performance that system was grinding to a halt if you tried to do stuff like run tests on all more than few cores in parallel.
- LordDragonfang 5y agoI'd be surprised if you could get genuinely good thermals on an i9 in a laptop. And that's partly on intel - i9s just have bad thermals, especially recently. Besides, if you genuinely need the power to justify using a chip with that kind of TDP, you should be looking into a desktop anyway. It is worth noting that Apple may have been intentionally neglecting thermals pending the transition to ARM - LTT did a few videos that give evidence to this.
- elcritch 5y agoNot to mention the power supplies with many laptops don't even provide enough watts to power the system at max load (including macbooks pros). They just use the battery to provide bursts at full speed. Generally that's good enough for a lot of uses. Gaming laptops do try and provide enough power and thermals to run full tilt. For work I chose an Alienware m15 because of this, and I wanted fast over thinnest. The m15's offer an i9 and probably could run one near full thermal load. In my case a desktop wouldn't do since I need to move around (doing IoT stuff, so I goto different parts of the lab). But, I do miss the macbook pro build quality. The first m15 died, and the replacement has a dead pixel.