3 ms·
Feature-wise, here's how Typesense compares to Meilisearch, Algolia and Elasticsearch: https://typesense.org/typesense-vs-algolia-vs-elasticsearch-vs-meilisearc
by jabo 5y ago
Feature-wise, here's how Typesense compares to Meilisearch, Algolia and Elasticsearch: https://typesense.org/typesense-vs-algolia-vs-elasticsearch-vs-meilisearch/ https://typesense.org/typesense-vs-algolia-vs-elasticsearch-...
I don't have comparative benchmarks, but here are some Typesense benchmarks:
A dataset containing 2.2 Million recipes (recipe names and ingredients):
- Took 3.6mins to index all 2.2M records
- On a server with 4vCPUs, Typesense was able to handle a concurrency of 104 concurrent search queries per second, with an average search processing time of 11ms.
A dataset containing 28 Million books (book titles, authors and categories):
- Took 78mins to index all 28M records
- On a server with 4vCPUs, Typesense was able to handle a concurrency of 46 concurrent search queries per second, with an average search processing time of 28ms.
With a dataset containing 3 Million products (Amazon product data), Typesense was able to handle a throughput of 250 concurrent search queries per second on an 8-vCPU 3-node Highly Available Typesense cluster.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]