> Though I think it is fair to call Anarcho-capitalism a form of anarchism It's just not. There's no way using the historical understanding of Anarchism where

> Though I think it is fair to call Anarcho-capitalism a form of anarchism It's just not. There's no way using the historical understanding of Anarchism where the following scenario wouldn't be seen as completely absurd: "Hi HeckFeck! Yeah, this is an anarchist society, we have no state and no rulers, well, except for Fred. He owns all the Water. He inherited the rights from his great grand father that bought it for grains from the starving citizens, yeah, he owns all the land too. Anyway, welcome to Fred's coal mine, grab your hat."