2 ms·

>Mueller declared in his public hearing that he would have indicted Trump, if he wasn't president. Is that true though? He didn't present any evidence of a cri

>Mueller declared in his public hearing that he would have indicted Trump, if he wasn't president. Is that true though? He didn't present any evidence of a crime. Congress could have impeached Trump successfully with some hard evidence, so was Muller protecting Trump by only insinuating there was evidence but not presenting any? I don't think vague connections "says enough". If the president really was conspiring with Russia I would want the FBI to present its findings instead of giving more vague insinuation.

gebruikersnaam 5y ago
"Mueller: A president can be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office" [1] Statements that Congress could have impeached Trump can only be viewed as stated in bad faith. Congress did impeach Trump, but for political reasons the Senate refused to remove him. [1] https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/24/robert-mueller-donald-trump-can-charged-after-leaving-office/1814190001/ https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/24/rober...