3 ms·
Your statement is simply false. There were four years of allegations and strong innuendo floated in congress and the press, as well as extraordinary use of care
by the_optimist 5y ago
Your statement is simply false. There were four years of allegations and strong innuendo floated in congress and the press, as well as extraordinary use of carefully worded statements to sustain extralegal focus with zero evidence of behavior that would violate an actual law. No one was charged with or found guilty of anything other than conjured process crimes. History will not forgive, and it will not forget.
- tootie 5y ago"Process crimes" is the refrain of the denier. The process crimes in question involved obstructing the investigation that could have uncovered more evidence. That is tantamount to full guilt. We know for a fact that Roger Stone worked with the campaign and Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks. He refused to cooperate and waited for his pardon. Manafort was reporting to his Russian handler while he was campaign manager. Trump Jr met with Russian agents about emails at Trump Tower. There was plenty of legitimate crime going on but the standard for a president shouldn't be conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. His open encouragement of Russian hacking even under the guise of "sarcasm" was grotesquely inappropriate. His refusal to confront Russia was shameful. His continued conspiring with his agents in Ukraine were plain as day and showed his willingness to break any rules he could to meet his ends. Trump, who won his campaign on ludicrous conspiracy theories spent his final days in office fomenting insurrection and suing relentlessly to overturn the election based on lies. His crimes done in broad daylight are 1000x worse than the ones we can't thoroughly prove.