If there's a thread that someone needs to be in our team is very inclusive. We just @ them into it and it's not an issue. I'm not mad. And there is an etique

If there's a thread that someone needs to be in our team is very inclusive. We just @ them into it and it's not an issue. I'm not mad. And there is an etiquette. I'm not blaming Slack - if you use it with some constructs in mind for how to keep conversations succinct and in their own places for others to easily find and use later - it works out better for all involved. There is value in using a tool in an efficient and repeatable manner that benefits all. This isn't a matter of being right or wrong. There are values in a user base being consistent in how they use a, mostly, unstructured tool - especially in the case of this example. Unfortunately abusing a feature that's meant for other use cases and is not there to always be used ("Also send to #...") can be used incorrectly, and in this case it is. Everyone who needs to be in the thread is already there. It's just broadcasting to everyone who doesn't need to be the statement they've made. I don't actually believe Zulip solves this problem, but it does look interesting for a number of other reasons.