3 ms·
Do not confuse medical and scientific community with authorities. The ill advisory was coming from WHO and parroted by national authorities (including CDC). All
by varjag 5y ago
Do not confuse medical and scientific community with authorities. The ill advisory was coming from WHO and parroted by national authorities (including CDC). All while the efficacy of masks against airborne/pulmonary diseases was pretty much established. WHO is not a scientific body conducting independent research but a bureaucratic organization with heavy dose of politics.
However back in spring 2020 when the official position amounted to "a mask is a facehugger", arguing for using masks (including by medical professionals) was effectively impossible.
- ZeroGravitas 5y ago> in spring 2020 when the official position amounted to "a mask is a facehugger" Well I guess it would be fruitless to ask for a source on this.
- varjag 5y ago“There’s no evidence that wearing masks on healthy people will protect them,” Perencevich said, the publication reported. “They wear them incorrectly, and they can increase the risk of infection because they’re touching their face more often.” https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article240780786.html https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article240... "Masks may actually increase your coronavirus risk if worn improperly, surgeon general warns" https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/02/health/surgeon-general-coronavirus-masks-risk-trnd/index.html https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/02/health/surgeon-general-co... It was literally everywhere until correction in april 2020.
- ZeroGravitas 5y agoI think we watched different versions of the Alien(s) franchise. Did they retcon that in the prequels? Don't let that facehugger insert a parasite embryo down your throat! Why not? Well overall it would be more beneficial to society if frontline medical staff were wearing that facehugger while treating patients with confirmed or suspected cases of the virus. Oh okay, that seems sensible.
- varjag 5y agoYou're just being intentionally obtuse. This attitude is exactly why it's pointless to list sources to pretend-inquisitive strangers on the Internet.
- ZeroGravitas 5y agoI honestly don't understand which bit of this quote, from your own source you don't understand: “Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS!” he wrote. “They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!” Is he saying that N95 masks don't work at all? That they only magically work for healthcare professionals? Or is he very, very, clearly, even within the limited confines of a tweet, explaining that N95 masks are better allocated to frontline medical staff than being randomly worn by low risk people in low risk locations doing low risk tasks? That using those resources more effectively will save more lives and that people in those lowee risk situations can easily get protection by keeping a safe distance and following other sensible precautions that they list. I can see how someone could intentionally misrepresent what he says, but I don't see an honest way to make that mistake.
- varjag 5y agoI don't think I ever challenged the plausible intent of the lie (to avoid shortages). That does not stop a lie being a lie, with long term, serious harm. The masks ARE effective in prevention COVID (both ways), and there is no demonstrated risk in wearing masks wrong. They lied on both accounts providing fuel to anti-masker movement. And yes the logical inconsistency of insisting masks are ineffective yet are necessary to frontline workers were pointed out year ago - you're not breaking any fresh ground here.