Doing that without the ability to quantify the affect is also a nonstarter. How would you know it's even making an appreciable difference, or if a lower factor

Doing that without the ability to quantify the affect is also a nonstarter. How would you know it's even making an appreciable difference, or if a lower factor would perform just as well? Without the groundwork theory to rely on, you'd be hard pressed to convince new buildings to do something like that on a whim. > You could do many measurements and lots of theory but nobody is going to engineer their buildings like cleanrooms anyway so the results of a lot of science wouldn’t be so good regardless. This is a very strange and confused sentiment.