No single participant has a significant chance, but if each target becomes more expensive on average, then state actors can only afford less targets, which make

No single participant has a significant chance, but if each target becomes more expensive on average, then state actors can only afford less targets, which makes the society as a whole more resilient. And if one target is so critical that it could take out a society, perhaps it would be better to either 1. Make it so minimalistic that it can be fully audited and secured or 2. Broken into smaller pieces and decentralised so they can either qualify for #1 or increase the total cost and complexity of compromise.