I like her analogies. For laymen who has followed determinism vs non-determinism (I’m a fan of the latter camp; Bell never ruled out determinism), this articl

I like her analogies. For laymen who has followed determinism vs non-determinism (I’m a fan of the latter camp; Bell never ruled out determinism), this article is on the cusp of comprehensible. There are definitely paragraphs that aren’t, but it’s still a good read. The exciting point, though, is that super determinism isn’t merely an interpretation of QM. Given time, one expects these theories to be testable.