You are presupposing a sales funnel, which would play a casual role in pushing an article with flimsy evidence that supports an existing world view (that you p

You are presupposing a sales funnel, which would play a casual role in pushing an article with flimsy evidence that supports an existing world view (that you presuppose is dominant). For the sake of argument, can you see how there's an inherent bias in your logic? This is all fine by me, as we're in a casual setting but if you do demand rigor in general. I see that you're not convinced, but isn't this annectodate enough to prompt an actual study of discrimination in house appraisals carried out by government agents with a strict methodology like you'd prefer?