3 ms·
At the rate things are going, I wonder if it would be cheaper to just tunnel through most of urban/suburban areas. Seems preferable to building on top of ancie
by yongjik 5y ago
At the rate things are going, I wonder if it would be cheaper to just tunnel through most of urban/suburban areas. Seems preferable to building on top of ancient railroads, dealing with all those rich NIMBY assholes, and forever getting stuck with suboptimal path.
South Korea built a whole 50km terminal section of HSR in a tunnel[1], starting at the outskirts of Seoul. It only took 3.0605 trillion KRW or about 2.7 billion dollars.
SF to San Jose is only slightly farther (~50 mi or ~80 km).
[1] https://www.tunneltalk.com/Korea-14Jul2015-Yulhyeon-Tunnel-final-breakthrough.php https://www.tunneltalk.com/Korea-14Jul2015-Yulhyeon-Tunnel-f...
- bombcar 5y agoLos Angles is doing tunneling for a subway and there’s tons of opposition and complaining.
- Clewza313 5y agoMy favorite video on the subject: https://la.curbed.com/2014/9/26/10042166/bev-hills-paper-warns-about-isis-attack-on-unbuilt-la-subway https://la.curbed.com/2014/9/26/10042166/bev-hills-paper-war... Gas explosions and terrorists, oh my!