The point is that there is nothing morally positive about forcing other people to pay for your ideas, even if you think that they are morally positive ideas. T

The point is that there is nothing morally positive about forcing other people to pay for your ideas, even if you think that they are morally positive ideas. The poster was responding to somebody that was being forced to do something that they didn’t want to, and the response was something along the lines of moral obligation. This is obviously not the shared opinion, and has no objective basis to it, so that argument could be, and has been, abused to justify any kind of force. It would be more honest to just admit that the situation has a lot more to do with power than morals, which I think is what you are getting at: there is no voice, only exit.