4 ms·
> That's more on the fence for me. What? You claimed you are comfortable with 0.01% chance, but now you're "on the fence" with a 1% chance? An analogy: some c
by yboris 5y ago
> That's more on the fence for me.
What? You claimed you are comfortable with 0.01% chance, but now you're "on the fence" with a 1% chance?
An analogy: some chance of your child being occasionally bullied in school, or a 0% chance of bullying but a 30% chance they'll get murdered.
You say "tough call" -- and I'm baffled.
- ethbr0 5y agoComfortable and on the fence are two different points, no?
- yboris 5y agoI asked "What % chance of nuclear holocaust per year are you wiling to take?" It is bizzarre to answer 0.01% only to follow up with "well, I could take 0.9% too" My question obviously implied "what's the maximum you're willing to tolerate" - else you could have just said 0% -- conveying zero information.