3 ms·
True, but what option will you choice: 1. Send trained 19-30 years old to risk there's life, minimum civilian casualties, but highest chance of combat casualti
by neatze 5y ago
True, but what option will you choice:
1. Send trained 19-30 years old to risk there's life, minimum civilian casualties, but highest chance of combat casualties.
2. Bomb urban area out of existence, with massive civilian casualties, medium chance of combat casualties.
3. Send terminators with medium civilian causalities and 0 combat casualties.
- mywittyname 5y agoI wonder how developed nations will deal with #3s being deployed on their shores. It might be much easier to sneak in Terminators than any sorts of bombs. And the terror factor would be off the charts.
- yboris 5y agoIf you take people out of war, wars are more likely to happen. There will be less opposition from the public when it's just "toasters" and "microwaves" (electronics) being sent overseas to fight "the bad guys". Given the track record of how many unjust wars that have been fought, we need more preventative measures against wars, not more technology to make wars easier and more palatable.