3 ms·
Are you thinking battles happen in open fields with no one around other than rows of opposing forces? Do you think no bad actors are going to have access to suc
by yboris 5y ago
Are you thinking battles happen in open fields with no one around other than rows of opposing forces? Do you think no bad actors are going to have access to such weapons? The world is a lot more complex than what you describe.
- neatze 5y agoHow did you made such conclusions from my sentence, I don't really understand. Civilians will suffer the most in wars and in violent conflict times. Urban warfare is the highest intensity warfare, with highest casualty rates both combat and civilians. First failed attempt of drone attack with chemical weapon was in 90's in Japan, I believe this if first recorded attempt of terrorist attack using drone. AI warfare with sci-fi flying, crawling, walking terminators will be more humane then carpet bombing population into oblivion (Soviet–Afghan War and Vietnam War), it will have substantially less combat and civilian casualties, in general it will increase kinetics (weapons effects), precision, accuracy, and decisiveness (RISTA).
- yboris 5y agoYou original sentence was implying that the deaths would occur to just 19-24 year olds - which clearly isn't going to be the case if the warfare happens in civilian quarters. You created a false dichotomy - as if those are the only two outcomes and we have to choose between them. When obviously (as your follow up comment shows), there are other scenarios where numerous innocent non-combatants will die.