That seems like an argument for stasis. We're likely to know more in the future than we know today, which means we should never do anything today because we wi

That seems like an argument for stasis. We're likely to know more in the future than we know today, which means we should never do anything today because we will be able to do it better / with less risk / more reliably / more efficiently / etc. tomorrow? We wouldn't be facing climate change if we hadn't industrialized. But, then, we also wouldn't live in a world of plenty and have increased the human carrying capacity of the planet many times over either.