3 ms·
I think it's an agree to disagree situation, then. I just think society is better off when everyone chips in. Not when you nickel and dime everyone for specifi
by dave5104 5y ago
I think it's an agree to disagree situation, then.
I just think society is better off when everyone chips in. Not when you nickel and dime everyone for specific services they use.
You sound anti-tax in general, so I don't think I really have any good arguments to address your wilderness property edge case.
- trutannus 5y agoGood assessment. I'd disagree that it being an edge-case isn't illustrative also, but that's a moot point. Appreciate you not trying to hammer me into agreement! If you, or anyone else for that matter, is ever interested in at least understanding this sort of position I highly recommend Robert Nozick's work in response to John Rawls A Theory of Justice entitled Anarchy State and Utopia.
- sneak 5y agoHeinlein once wrote: > There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him.