3 ms·
I am curious what your thoughts are on other commenters making as if it is possible to prevent these types of attacks by just taking security 'more seriously'.
by gist 5y ago
I am curious what your thoughts are on other commenters making as if it is possible to prevent these types of attacks by just taking security 'more seriously'. My guess is that you know that no matter how much is spent with a large entity and many employees it's near impossible to prevent this type of attack. People make mistakes people are easily fooled people don't follow what they are told to do and so on.
I can't even begin to imagine the amount of people that could cause an issue in the size company you are a CISO at.
- Mountain_Skies 5y agoYou cannot completely eliminate risk but you certainly can reduce it and be prepared for what to do when one of those low probability risks ends up happening.
- nonameiguess 5y agoIt's certainly possible to achieve serious security but probably not practical for most private entities. I've spent most of my development career making software for the US intelligence community and their systems were definitely not going to get broken into by a ransomware gang. Security measures include multilevel air gapping plus heavily armed physical security, six foot thick concrete walls set back from the street by other concrete barriers, locating facilities on military installations, disabling USB ports on most devices, banning anything radio enabled from being anywhere near your workstations, jamming radio signals anyway, severely punishing, possibly executing, anyone caught working as an intentional insider threat, requiring multiple persons in the custody and approval chains to move any files from one network to another via write-once media like DVDs, having the transfer media itself in a separate locked cabinet in a separate locked room inside the actual classified vault serving as an office. Installing and running everything in a separately sandboxed staging environment even after it gets through all the walls and air gaps and DVDs and running it through some fairly extensive testing and analysis before putting it anywhere near a production system. Clearly, you can never make it literally impossible, but to my knowledge, nobody has ever managed to get malicious software onto a classified production system. Information leaks are, of course, another story.
- lifeisstillgood 5y agoThank you - this is the closest I have read on this thread as to the real security practises we will need in the future - if you can elaborate more that will be helpful. Are these (i suspect not) published anywhere as "Three letter agency network security standards"?
- _tk_ 5y agoIf there’s a business need, you can secure a wooden box on the sidewalk in a way, that it is almost impossible to break in. It will be very costly, but if profit or IP depends on it, one can find a way. Taking cyber security „seriously“ always depends on who you see as a potential attacker. I don’t think any corporation on the planet has the capacity or willingness to really protect itself against dedicated state actors. This does not include ransomware gangs that are not prosecuted by the Russian Federation or DPRK, but highly specialized forces within the usual intelligence services. The types of ransomware attacks we see today might not be preventable as well, every company on the planet will get or was already hit. But, the difference between the attacks: the amount of damage. If money is spent on security, that amount will certainly be smaller.