3 ms·
The problem with this is that you can easily bankrupt a company by codifying exceedingly onerous terms. Google (to take your example) happens to be able to (ba
by qubex 5y ago
The problem with this is that you can easily bankrupt a company by codifying exceedingly onerous terms.
Google (to take your example) happens to be able to (barely) afford 10% of their revenue taken from their income. Another company with a different cost structure (perhaps in another sector) might not be able to afford that. The upshot is that providing a codified “one size fits all” punishment could be disastrous (if you consider preserving companies to be desirable: for the sake of this argument I do, but entirely legitimately you might not).
In the case of Italy (I’m Italian) and it’s awkward, glacial justice system, that’s a very dangerous assumption to make. This place is already hostile enough towards businesses.