>but a big company may be big because they are good and people use them, which is good. I agree in part, but I disagree that 'good' can be a state that applies

>but a big company may be big because they are good and people use them, which is good. I agree in part, but I disagree that 'good' can be a state that applies universally. Personally, I think of it as a tag that you can apply to individual actions on a case-by-case basis. Also, is there any company that has gotten big solely because 'they are good and people use them'?