I know he meant it to show as a negative but I think it is fine in decent number of scenarios. The companies who have lot of "least engaged" employees, may be t

I know he meant it to show as a negative but I think it is fine in decent number of scenarios. The companies who have lot of "least engaged" employees, may be they can look at their work culture. Or better concern themselves more with outcomes instead of outlays. This way "disengaged" employees like me would rather produce results remotely instead of buying into, motivation, engagement, or workplace well-being bullshit while suffering claustrophobic workplaces.