4 ms·
(a pedantic correction: Pike originally describes it as a systems language, which can include infrastructure) Thing is none of the above is going to apply when
by dimitrios1 5y ago
(a pedantic correction: Pike originally describes it as a systems language, which can include infrastructure)
Thing is none of the above is going to apply when generics land. You mentioned kubernetes which use complex, maintainable abstractions and structures with only the facilities Go provides. There isn't that much difference between writing a maintainable system, whether the primary user is the business, or other software.
- gengstrand 5y agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFejpH_tAHM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFejpH_tAHM “Go is software for the parts that we work on which is mostly infrastructure.” Generics is a good thing and I look forward to seeing the details in how Go will support it.
- gher-shyu3i 5y agoYou can say the same about Java and C#. These claims about golang are all baseless as far as I'm concerned, especially since they're contradicted by reality.