Yeah you are -- repository pattern, maybe some built-in serializers/adapters is what I'd expect to be the extent of DDD for most CRUD-y projects. Generally the

Yeah you are -- repository pattern, maybe some built-in serializers/adapters is what I'd expect to be the extent of DDD for most CRUD-y projects. Generally the less libraries/frameworks the better. > CRUDy apps basically mean you have some domain related structs and a few database methods to connect those structs to data. Yup fully agreed here -- I was trying to see if there were cases where they poster had to build the abstractions you'd want for a DDD-like system. Normally you don't have to so I was wondering if their experience matched up with my ideas about DDD to start with.