3 ms·
Actually, the only page in the site to claim "open source" with regards to the calculator is a blog article[1] by a non-technical staff. Elsewhere, it is only r
by syockit 5y ago
Actually, the only page in the site to claim "open source" with regards to the calculator is a blog article[1] by a non-technical staff. Elsewhere, it is only referred to as an "open" graphing calculator. The HN submission is titled incorrectly.
[1] https://www.numworks.com/blog/interview-kevin-from-virginia/ https://www.numworks.com/blog/interview-kevin-from-virginia/
- snvzz 5y ago>the only page in the site to claim "open source" with regards to the calculator is a blog article[1] by a non-technical staff. They should fix this immediately and keep their employees under check. It is a PR disaster.
- elkos 5y agoThey should also inform their non-technical personel during on-boarding about the significance of the "open-source" term in terms of licensing. There are organizations and corporations that focus on such terms during on-boarding either because that's their development model or they are aware that using such a term while not adhering to it could draw valid criticism.