3 ms·

Well, when released in 2008 it was a $600 monitor, I got it second-hand for 80€. I'm not sure what DICOM has to do with color reproduction quality ? Also it se

Well, when released in 2008 it was a $600 monitor, I got it second-hand for 80€. I'm not sure what DICOM has to do with color reproduction quality ? Also it seems to be a quite a bit older standard than sRGB... By definition, you can't "see the unseen". "Yellow" and "blue" are opponent "colors", so, by definition, a proper mixture of them is going to give you grey : https://www.handprint.com/HP/WCL/color2.html#opponentfunctions https://www.handprint.com/HP/WCL/color2.html#opponentfunctio... Also, when talking about subtle color effects, you have to consider that personal variation might come into play (for instance red-green "colorblindness" is a spectrum).

jart 6y ago
It looks like this thing is the thing I want to buy https://www.apple.com/pro-display-xdr/ https://www.apple.com/pro-display-xdr/ There's plenty of light that is currently unseeable. Look at chromaticity chart for sRGB. If your definition of color mixes yellow and blue and as grey then you've defined color wrong, because nature has a different definition where it's pink. For example the CIELAB colorspace will mix the two as pink. Also I'm not colorblind. If I'm on the spectrum I would be on the able to see more color more accurately end of the spectrum. Although when designing charts I'm very good at choosing colors that accommodate people who are colorblind, while still looking stylish, because I feel like inclusive technology is important.