4 ms·
> Dogecoin has exactly the same energy spending incentives as Bitcoin. While the incentives are the same, Dogecoin has roughly 7.4x lower energy requirements t
by tromp 6y ago
> Dogecoin has exactly the same energy spending incentives as Bitcoin.
While the incentives are the same, Dogecoin has roughly 7.4x lower energy requirements than Bitcoin currently, so accepting Dogecoin instead of Bitcoin is a tad less offensive.
- La1n 6y agoWith a market cap that is 20 times lower, higher market cap means higher prices, means more miners and thus more energy requirement
- tromp 6y agoNot quite. Energy requirements correspond to daily dollar emission (column PoW produced 24h in [1]). Early in their emission, coins can have high daily emission and low marketcap. And dogecoin is at less than 1/3 of its 500B soft total supply [2]. [1] https://www.f2pool.com/coins https://www.f2pool.com/coins [2] https://john-tromp.medium.com/a-case-for-using-soft-total-supply-1169a188d153 https://john-tromp.medium.com/a-case-for-using-soft-total-su...
- swinglock 6y agoOnly because it's not used. This is like arguing we should switch from using cars currently on the road because they use energy, to cars currently standing in a garage, because we measured and clearly the parked cars use less energy than the cars on the road. It's not even hyperbole, it's precisely equivalent and just as boneheaded as it sounds.
- arss 6y agoThis is not true. Dogecoin is way lower KW per hash than bitcoin. Dogecoin is .12 and bitcoin is 707 https://www.trgdatacenters.com/most-environment-friendly-cryptocurrencies/ https://www.trgdatacenters.com/most-environment-friendly-cry...
- square_usual 6y agoMusk said they were looking for crypto with an energy requirement of <1% of bitcoin's, so that would rule Doge out too.
- tromp 6y agoHe should look at the one that uses 0.15% of bitcoin's while having a much more even distribution than Dogecoin (which had 20x block reward in its first year).